We All Forget Esther Was Just a Girl
The Bell Jar is a staple in our modern understanding of mental health. TV shows, books, movies, and conversations often reference the novel but entirely miss its depth. The nature of Sylvia Plath’s life, and especially her death, have created an air of stigma and apprehension around her work. Often, readers seem to either handle the weight of the novel’s origin either by separating the author and the work, or by exaggerating the relationship.Although it is enriching to analyze The Bell Jar apart from the life of Sylvia Plath, it is entirely impossible to completely understand the value in the novel without seeing the deepest heartbreak of the story. It is now known after Plath’s death that she had once intended to publish a second novel detailing a more grown-up Esther in a phase of “health”. Of course this second novel was never completed because Plath went on to die by suicide before she could write it.
What I mean to say is that there must be a balance found in reading The Bell Jar, in all honesty I find the story to be one of a phoenix rising from the ashes, the story of a girl who not only survived but went on to permanently mark the American mind, but it is equally a story of great tragedy. Plath is not someone who can be broken down and analyzed, her words have lived in such infamy for so long now I feel we often forget she was just a woman, and a poet. “I am, I am, I am” (234).
It is in this vein that I think it is important to view Esther as a character who is so much more than her struggle. She is not “pure”, she is not always kind, and she is certainly not society’s picture of a woman. It is in Esther’s imperfections that she is the most human. Esther treats many of the people in her life horribly, her mother gets the brunt of this burden, but she is mean to nurses, friends, and peers. Esther honestly reads as cruel at times: she leaves Doreen locked outside their room after the night out with Lenny (and this was before she even got deep into her spiral), she borderline bullies and mocks her mother’s sympathies, and she constantly belittles those around her and attempts to establish a constant sense of superiority. It is so easy to absolve her of a lot of guilt and responsibility while reading as we feel a deep sympathy for her, but it is in this way that the character, and Plath by extension, have become so dehumanized in the general view. Despite the often morbid language, and distressing spiral Esther uses and undergoes, we consistently see elements of her adolescence shining through.
Many important thought patterns Esther experiences in the novel that can easily be attributed to her age and personality are assumed to be a symptom of her illness or an effect of the lens of the bell jar. For example, the way she feels about Buddy, her sudden loss of interest in him and intense insecurity at the thought he exaggerated his attractions is very reminiscent of common insecurities amongst teenage girls across time. This comparison is not to say that Esther’s and Plath’s journeys and struggles were not incredibly real and mature, but it is to say that the power and importance of The Bell Jar is in the humanity of it. It is so easy to over analyze this novel. The Bell Jar is a haunting story not because it is some complete masterpiece but because it is deeply honest, youthful, and painted with many brushes of Sylvia Plath’s own life.


Hi Olly,
ReplyDeleteI agree with this sentiment wholeheartedly. Plath herself said that the people she wrote were caricatures, and that may have extended to Esther's cruelty or bad tendencies. More broadly, I think that people are complicated, and it has to be said that people are still worth saving, people still have stories worth listening to even if they're crummy, self-centered, and ungrateful adolescents (teenage dirtbags, even) because people can change, and that's basically what we didn't get to see, again as you said.
I think that the integrity of writing a deeply flawed character as the narrator is an especially brave decision to make given the extreme stigmatization of mental illness at the time. If you want people to sympathize with a marginalized group, you might want to present a human who is flawed enough to be human, but still a lot nicer than Esther is over the course of the book. By not presenting a conventional person, and showing this complicated young woman with her heterodox opinions on marriage and a biting internal monologue, Plath not only pushed the boundaries of what was acceptable, but also plays into how mental illness shapes how she thinks of other people. For example, Esther has what verges on non-bizarre persecutory delusions while in the asylum system, and these make her feel sure that the others secretly hate her, which can't be good for her opinon of them.
Hi Olly, I think it's important and interesting that you noted readers should neither read this novel without considering the life of Plath or connect too many dots between Esther and Plath. Like you said, the flaws of Esther are what makes her so human and should not be excused or rejected. I definitely agree with that as sometimes when we read so much about a character we try to justify certain things about them to fit our own narratives better. Great blog.
ReplyDeleteHi Olly! I really appreciate your take on this novel, almost taking a step back from analysis to remember what this course started with: a girl coming of age. While we can often spend time analyzing details, characters, and timelines, I love how you mentioned that the true beauty isn't found in this "study," but rather the realness. The realness not only of Esther's young, teenage girl age, but also Sylvia Plath's life and tragedies also. Awesome post!
ReplyDeleteYou articulate very well the paradox I always feel when reading and discussing this novel: I always emphasize out of the gate that it is a story of *survival* and *recovery* (a "phoenix" narrative, especially if we consider Plath's remarkable creative career in the decade after these experiences), precisely because Plath's biography looms so large behind any reading of the novel. I think it's vital when we encounter this narrative to remember that Plath's death is NOT inevitable at the time she is writing this novel: she is aware of the persistent threat of the bell jar's re-descension (as reflected in the final chapter), but she is hard at work turning her harrowing experiences into art, a source for insight and reflection. I'd also say that this is why it's so vital that readers note the social-critical aspect of Plath's story: this is both a memoir of what it's like to be subjected to debilitating and life-threatening mental illness, but it's ALSO a memoir about (to put it crudely) how the sexism and hypocrisy of 1950s America would drive anyone "crazy." Part of our sense of Esther's strength and resilience at the end of the novel comes from the ways in which she has solidified and been affirmed in her critical rejection of mainstream ideas about marriage, sexuality, and a "woman's place."
ReplyDeleteIt's also true that throughout the novel, even through her recovery, we can see Esther behaving like a shitty friend and daughter to people who clearly care about her. (You mention her leaving Doreen in a puddle of her own vomit outside her door, but she also abandons her to Lenny after being asked specifically NOT to.) It's a little known fact about depression that it can make people act in shitty ways to people they love and care about--it can make us self-absorbed, self-obsessed, dismissive of others. And, as David Foster Wallace demonstrates extensively in his short story "The Depressed Person," the person in the bell jar is usually all too aware of how shittily they are behaving to others, and this makes them feel worse. It's a spiral, like so much in the context of depression.
Hello Olly. I like how you show the humanity of Esther. While fictional, the Bell Jar may have been pretty accurate details of Sylvia Plath's life which did not have the same ending as the book. I think a pretty big part in Esther's recovery was finding someone who truly understood her. Not Buddy, her Mom, and anyone else she was close to understood her but a Dr. Nolan. She becomes the first person Esther feels understands her and can open up to. Hopefully everyone can find themselves someone like Dr. Nolan before its too late.
ReplyDeleteHey Olly, this blog really shows how the Belljar is a story of adolescence, and that aligns with being a coming-of-age novel. Ester is a complex character, and her more immature qualities make her even more interesting. I think you bring up a great point of how people tend to excuse behaviors because the person behind them are struggling. At the same time, Ester is not a perfect victim, and a nuanced character with flaws, which allows us to humanize her and relate to her. I think Plath's point was for us to relate to Ester, and its a shame people simplify her character so much that they excuse the many times Ester is outright mean or cruel to the people around her, rather than acknowledging the characters many nuances.
ReplyDeleteHey Olly! I love how you focus on the inner monologue of Ester, which I think helps the reader root for her despite her harmful actions. I'm also a big fan of your characterization of some of her thoughts as "normal" and "adolescent" because I do really think that her perspectives on marriage, careers, patriarchy, sex, motherhood, etc., are relatable and even semi-healthy. I say semi-healthy because I think her distaste for men and their treatment of women is indicative of some self-confidence. It's only because she has a drive and a strong impression of her identity and what she wants that she is so horrified by Mrs. Willard's self-made rug story and the idea of being Mrs. Buddy Willard or a mother or a wife in general. I do really like this side of Ester, and I like how you reminded us to see her through a more holistic lens and not just a lens of mental illness.
ReplyDelete